About Me

My photo
Either an author who fences, or a fencer who tends to write a lot. I found a passion for writing first, then I found fencing. I also found that the pen and the sword work very well together. The pen may be mightier than the sword but together they are much greater.
Showing posts with label weapon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label weapon. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 13, 2022

di Grassi: Pick it Up and Use It

 Greetings,

In this month's post in which we look at a section in di Grassi's treatise in which he regards anything by which a person may offend and defend as a weapon. From this premise I will expand on this idea to examine some odd items which are often found laying around a campsite that may be used as a weapon, primarily of a defensive nature.


"ALbeit Wepons aſwel offenſiue as defenſiue be infinite, becauſe all that whatſoeuer a man may handle to offend an other or defend himſelfe, either by flinging or kepinge faſt in his hand may in my opinion be tearmed Weapon." Giacomo di Grassi (1594)


The following discussion is formed on the basis of the above statement found in Giacomo di Grassi's (1594) The true Art of Defence exactlie teachinge the manner how to handle weapons ſafelie, aſwel offenſiue as defenſiue, With a Treatiſe of Diſceit or Falſing, And with a mean or waie how a man may practiſe of himſelfe to gett Strength, Iudgement, And Actiuitie. This has been sourced from the 1594 translation of the treatise not the 1570 Italian and then translated, because I do not speak Italian and the Elizabethan English text is a text in its own right, worthy of study as I will likely have discussed previously. Moving on with the subject at hand...

There have been quite a few movies, especially of recent times, where a protagonist has picked up something convenient and used it as a weapon. This usually in the middle of a brawl, where rules have been thrown out of the window and the pair are fighting to survive. An incidence comes to mind where a rolled up magazines was used as a baton, for example, in "The Bourne Supremacy" (2004). The same sort of thing occurred in sword combats. While we are not likely to be involved in a brawl with a sword to save our lives, it is useful to examine some different objects, and approaches that can be used just in case we are surprised with an unfamiliar item.

Defensive Items

In this case, the focus will be on weapons of a defensive nature. This means weapons which are not intended to strike an opponent. A dagger, for example has both offensive and defensive capabilities, so will not feature in this discussion. Where as the buckler, which has the prime object of being defensive will be present, at least in reference in these discussions. 

Defensive weapons can be used for offensive purposes. Indeed, it is di Grassi who mentions the use of the "muſtachio" a blow to the face with the edge of the buckler, should the opponent be close and the sword bound or occupied. This is not their prime purpose, their prime purpose is for defending the individual who picks them up. Further, it will be some generic items, things that may be lying around in a Renaissance setting that will be addressed for use as these defensive items.

Relatable

The trick in each of these items is to approach using the item by relating it to an item more commonly used in fencing and then applying the same rules, taking into account its idiosyncrasies. There is no item which should not be relatable to another item more familiar. It is these links that should allow you to pick up anything you like and defend yourself with it. 

In an attempt to keep this discussion relatively brief, there will be a limit on the number of items that will be discussed. Each one of these will be related to a weapon form that I have discussed in one of my articles previously, so the rules can be found there, if you are unfamiliar with them. The trick is to look at them from the correct point of view.

"Buckler"

So we no doubt have all walked into a kitchen and picked up a pot lid and thought ,"Hey if this was bent the other way, it would make a great buckler." in return it could be said that it could make a good buckler just the way it is, especially in an emergency. It is the right shape, it comes with a handle in the right spot and it is made of a robust material. Further, being in a kitchen, finding an offensive device to go with it should not be a problem. The word messer does mean "knife" in German after all, and a stout blow with a rolling pin is going to make an opponent think twice. 

"Kitchen Combat" here we come? Instead, I think we should move a little "outdoors" though the same objects would be available in a camp kitchen as well. There are even more objects available when you think about it here, and the items become even more robust in nature.

"Cane"

The idea behind using a cane is a stick used to defend yourself, in its simplest terms. In a truly combative situation, the same stick could also be used as a club, and thus as an offensive device, but we will focus on the defensive aspect. Here there are many options, not restricted to flags, staffs, shooting sticks for muskets, pretty much anything with a stick involved. Let's push that envelope just a little further, what about a shovel?

It could be used sort of like a buckler and cane combined if you use the blade upward. This method, by the way is rather unwieldy and strains the arm a lot (Yes, I've actually done it.). The better way is to hold the shovel by the handle and use the blade as a counter-lever. This way it makes a very solid defence which the opponent will have a very hard time moving. It is not particularly mobile, but once you're behind it, you're pretty safe from an opponent's attacks if you stay there.

"Cloak"

Any, preferably large, piece of material can be used as a cloak. I really mean any. I have used a coat, and a tabbard both used as a cloak on separate instances. A blanket or a tablecloth, both of good material will serve as good stand-ins for cloaks in emergencies. In fact some of the best cloaks that I have seen, and worn, were made from blankets, or at least blanket-type material. It's the volume of material that makes this device effective, and also keeps the warmth in when you wear it. This is why slightly heavier and thicker material is more effective than thinner.

"Rotella"

A rotella is a large shield which protects most of the arm and shoulder, and extends out from the arm. If a chair was picked up, especially a wooden camping chair; forearm against the back, seat grabbed and legs toward the opponent, it could act as a rotella with some added reach. Now, the hand would be exposed on the outside, but the opponent would have to get past the legs of the chair first. Of course the wielder of the chair also needs to be careful about those legs, if using certain rules, to ensure they do not strike their opponent. If no such rules exist, they could be a potent weapon for striking. This does not even begin to investigate their potential for entanglement.

Out of the weapon suggestions that I have discussed, this is the only one that I have not actually put into practise more than a single time, at least in a practical/bouting situation. I have certainly thought about the theoretical side of it, and I think that there is a lot of potential. After all, I am the one who is usually writing about people sitting on the chair, not using them for weapons.

Why?

The purpose of this investigation has been to open your eyes to different possibilities. To show how different things are related to one another, that many things that we think are foreign, are actually not that different from one another. You may not have learnt, or been taught, how to use a device, but if you relate it back to a device that you do know of similar construction, then you have a step-up.

Examine the usual weapons that are used during your form of fencing, compare them to other forms of fencing, then compare them to other items that you might find laying about. See how they might be used in a similar fashion should you have to use them at a moment's notice. Think about the chance of a sudden invasion of a campsite, you have to pick up the closest thing to you to defend yourself. Think about a tavern brawl, you have to pick up the closest thing to you and defend yourself. Expand your mind have a look at objects differently, it will reveal a lot about the objects, and the objects you are basing their use upon.

Cheers,

Henry.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You will notice a lot of Wikipedia links in my posts. This is a great resource of free information which is now reliably researched, as you will note by the references which appear at the bottom of each page. I donate to the Wikimedia Foundation every year to keep this non-profit group operational, and I recommend that everyone do the same, you can do this HERE. Please give, and keep this free source of information alive, there are few of them these days.

Saturday, April 13, 2019

A Sword is a Sword

Greetings,

With no surprise, especially considering the title of the article and the blog, this article is about swords. But it is not just about them as objects alone, singularly, or pointing out one type of sword. It is an examination of swords in general. People, when they discuss sword, especially if they have anything to do with them in hobbies or study, are quick to separate and isolate them by function, culture and type. This discussion is designed to break down some of those barriers, to look at swords as swords.

The discussion which follows is more curatorial than social or practical, though both social and practical elements will come into the discussion. It is difficult to discuss swords without swordsmanship. To attempt such would be like attempting to discuss cars and their performance without discussing driving. There will not be a history of the sword, nor will there be any discussion of any particular type of sword, in fact this is exactly what this discussion is trying to get away from. The purpose of this discussion is to present the similarities between swords, rather than their differences so that they can all be appreciated with equal worth.

Definition

The Oxford dictionary defines a sword as a noun, "A weapon with a long metal blade and a hilt with a hand guard, used for thrusting or striking and now typically worn as part of ceremonial dress." (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sword). The Cambridge dictionary defines it as "a weapon with a long, sharp metal blade and a handle, used especially in the past" (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sword). Finally, the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines it as "a weapon (such as a cutlass or rapier) with a long blade for cutting or thrusting that is often used as a symbol of honor or authority" (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sword).

All define the sword as a weapon, all define it as having a long blade. Interestingly, in two of them they specify a metal blade. Two relegate the weapon to the past, while the other attributes symbolic meaning to the weapon, thus giving it some use in the present. What will be noted in all of the definitions is that they are very rudimentary, though they do have some specificity to them. Depending if one or another of these definitions is chosen, some types of sword may actually be not included in their definition. The most extreme examples would be the non-metalic swords used by some islanders and also pre-colonial peoples. Care must be taken in a definition.

A sword, could be described as a weapon with long blade designed for cutting and/or thrusting, which has a hand grip of some fashion. However specificity in length of blade could create questions as to where a weapon crosses the line between a knife and a sword. Then there is the question of weapons such as the "messer" which was a large knife, but was the length of a short sword. It needs to be noted that the definition of the sword is not as easy as it might sound.

Sword is a Sword

All swords are swords, regardless whether it is a sabre or a rapier, katana or a schiavona, it is a sword. We are the individuals who divide them up and show them to be different in shape, or nationality, or use, or period, or whatever. In all cases all of the weapons which have been named, all six of them are swords. Obviously we divide them up so that it is easier to understand what we are talking about, but sometimes this creates confusion if a person does not understand what the other person is talking about. The most important point that needs to be made is that they are all swords. Regardless of which period of history, or from which culture, they are swords.

Similarities

"The difficulty of treating the Sword is enhanced by the peculiar individuality which characterises it, evidenced by an immense variety of physique, and resulting as much from unconscious selection as from deep design. One of the characteristics of indigenous art is that no two articles, especially no two weapons, are exactly alike; yet they vary only within narrow and measurable limits." (Burton, 1987:xxi)
Burton (1987) is describing how swords are both complex articles in which no two are exactly the same, but at the same time all fall within a certain level of variation. It is this second point which needs to be noted. There are similarities across swords which cannot be denied. They all have blades and hilts, obviously, but a person can get even deeper in the examination of the similarities. The cross-guard is also a similar item. In some cases it may be a part of the handle, but it is still present, if in a reduced form. In the case of the katana it is the tsuba, thus a circular cross-guard, which would seem somewhat contradictory. The pommel is also present, it is the part of the sword which holds the rest of it together, and in the western versions adds counter-weight. In the katana this is the kashira.

These similarities which have been pointed out, only are those in the hilts of the weapons, the blades also have similar characteristics as well. All have a strong, weak and a middle portion of the blade; these are all relative strengths in comparison to one another. The strong is most used for defending, the weak is most used for offending, and the middle is most used for controlling actions of the opponent's weapon. When it comes to the question of edges, the weapons do have at least two edges, even though one of them may be blunt. Even this blunt edge can be used for actions against the opponent, such as parrying and actions of control. These similarities in physical form need to be noted and appreciated.

Shape, Use or Culture?

Swords have been classified and organised into groups often by specific shape, function or culture. The question is what is the best method of classifying them, is it one or a combination of these methods. Burton (1987) suggests two which are common among collections being Topical and Geographical or Material and Formal, the former considers the culture, location, place and date, the latter which only considers the objects themselves (Burton, 1987:xxii). Obviously both have their advantages and disadvantages. Coe et. al. (1996) use a more combination system taking into account both the artefacts themselves along with the cultural situation in which they were found in, thus taking advantage of both approaches described by Burton (Coe et.al., 1996:6).

The combination of classification of weapons has the advantage of not only examining the objects themselves and examining them for construction, shape and manufacture, but can also look at the culture in which they were found and look at their use, which is often sorely missing in curatorial approaches to weapons. This missing approach leads these curatorial approaches to divide swords down definitive lines which are not actually there, due to misinterpretations as to how the weapons were used.

Some weapons were more specialised in a single area of use than others, this is undoubted. A perfect example of this is the estoque, or tuck, which was designed to be used by an armoured combatant against another for a thrusting attack designed to pierce through gaps in armour. The weapon had no edge, so there was no chance that there was any chance of cutting ability. Often this is claimed to be the origin of the rapier, however that it is a weapon designed for armoured combatants makes this a somewhat spurious claim.

The rapier is a classic weapon for the abuse of weapon historians about its use. For some it was a purely point-orientated weapon which could not cut at all. For others it could cut just as easily as more military-styled weapons which were its contemporaries. Neither of these is accurate. The rapier was a point-orientated weapon, meaning that it was designed more for the thrust than the cut, but it could still cut, just not as well as a military sword of the same period, it was designed for civilian duelling and self-defence.

On the other end of the scale some would attempt to have us believe that the longsword was purely designed for cutting and that it did not thrust at all. Longswords came in several different forms indeed Oakeshott numbers twenty-two different types of sword in the medieval period (Oakeshott, 1998:24), thirteen of which could be claimed to be longswords. Some of these were predominantly cutting weapons, but that is not to say they did not have a tip to thrust with, and some of them were more designed to thrust with also. So, needless to say, it depends on which form of the longsword is being spoken about.

The sabre is in a similar situation, it can also thrust as well. No doubt Oriental weapons have the same spurious claims been made about them. These arguments will not be discussed here as I do not have the expertise in this field. Needless to say, weapons need to be examined carefully before claims on their use are made, especially when it comes to specialisation.

Conclusion

Each person has their preferences. Some people prefer chocolate ice-cream over vanilla, some people just don't like ice-cream at all. Preferences for swords are much the same, just because you prefer the longsword, does not mean that you cannot appreciate the jian, katana, gladius or rapier. Each sword has something to say about it and of its use. There are many similarities between weapons which can be appreciated.

Each sword was a tool designed for its time and place, to take it out of this time and compare it to something else, to deride it is not useful. Placing a sword on a modern battlefield and trying to compare it to modern weapon systems is like trying to take an apple and compare it to an orange among other oranges. Sure, both of them are fruit, but they are simply not a good match for comparison unless the question is for preference about fruit, not the best orange.

The greatest challenge we face is to get out of our comfort zones, and in some cases these comfort zones are quite small. Have a look at some others swords and appreciate them for what they are and what they can do. Make comparisons of them with swords that you are familiar with, but not for the purposes of derision, but for the purposes of noting similarities and other positive notes. This way you will come to appreciate more weapons and also the skills that go along with these weapons. Remember that the two deciding principles of time and distance exist for all martial arts armed and unarmed, you can learn something from all different places if you really put your mind to it.

Bibliography

Burton, R. F. (1987) The Book of the Sword, Dover Publications Inc., New York, USA

Cambridge Dictionary (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/)

Coe, M. et. al. (1996) Swords and Hilt Weapons, Prion Books Limited, London

Oakeshott, E. (1998) The Sword in the Age of Chivalry, The Boydell Press, Woodbridge

Oxford Dictionary (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/)

Merriam-Webster Dictionary (https://www.merriam-webster.com/)

Thursday, July 13, 2017

What is a Feder?

Greetings,

What follows is a small portion of a paper I have written on the subject. There is a link after this portion if you are interested in reading the rest of the paper. I investigated it to find out more about this particular weapon, which I initially did not know very much about. This way I could better approach the subject of this weapon with a more open mind.

Cheers,

Henry.

The Short Answer

            While a long answer will be forth-coming about the federschwert detailing various arguments about the weapon and discussing what was used for and its history there is also the short answer to consider as well. The short answers cover such things as literal translations of the name of the sword from German to English. The slightly more in-depth discussions of the weapon lead to further investigations which will be presented further along.

The “Feather-sword”

            The first place people go for an interpretation of what a foreign thing is will be to translate the name of the object from the native language into English and interpret this into some idea of what this means thus, "federschwert - a lightweight sword. "Feder" is German for "feather," and "schwert" is German for "sword."" (Shackleford, 2010). This would seem to be a logical progression and explanation of the weapon, but leaves the reader with no real explanation of what the weapon is for.
This is where an explanation from a more use-approach comes in handy, “A Federschwert ("Feather swords") is a foiled practice blade with a large flanged ricasso and a thick but narrow blade used for longsword training.” (Wassom, 2016).

A School Longsword

            Wassom’s (2016) explanation of what a feder is begins to explain not only what a federschwert is but also what it is used for. There is also a physical description which is most useful. Further explanation of the form of the weapon is possible and even a hint as to its use,

“special fencing school longswords called federschwert, with a narrow rapier-like blade and more mass close to the cross, in the area called the schilt or the ricasso.” (Norling, 2011)

            With all this in mind there is the image of a weapon which is relatively light, blunt because it is ...

The rest of this article can be found in Un-Blogged: A Fencer's Ramblings by Henry Walker, which is available in paperback from:

Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Blogged-Ramblings-Henry-Leigh-Walker/dp/098764470X
Booktopia: https://www.booktopia.com.au/un-blogged-henry-leigh-walker/book/9780987644701.html
Among other places...

It is also available in electronic format (pdf) from: https://buy.stripe.com/fZecP419c7CB9VKeUV

... or direct from the author.

Bibliography

Norling, R. (2011) “Sparring Swords – Introduction”, HROARR, http://hroarr.com/sparring-swords-introduction/

Norling, R. (2013) “The Whatchamacallit-schwert”, HROARR, http://hroarr.com/the-feder-whatchamacallit/

Shackleford, S. (2010) Spirit of the Sword: A Celebration of Artistry and Craftsmanship, Krause Publications, Iola, USA

Wassom, D. (2016) “Some Historical Swiss Swords Examined”, The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts, http://www.thearma.org/spotlight/swiss-swords.html#.WPge4PmGPIU