A previous post discussed the subject with regard to treatises and the use of the sword and shield. In this discussion it mentioned the Norse sagas. The following is a discussion about the Norse sagas and the information which can be found within them which is potentially useful when reconstructing the use of the sword and shield in the Norse fashion. It should be noted that this indicates some directions which are presented by the evidence, but does not make any wholesale claims about how a sword and shield should or should not be used. These are preliminary findings from a documentary discussion.
Norse Tradition – From the Sagas
The first
thing that should be noted is that the Norse warriors should not be thought of
as mere brutes who used mere strength to bash their way to their opponents,
skill was evidently present, “Grettir struck down between him and the shield,
cutting off both his hands at the wrist.” (Palmer, 1999:15). Such a blow
performed shows skill with the sword and demonstrates that the art of war as
practiced by the Norse needs a closer look before sweeping claims are made.
Shield Construction
Norse shields evidently had
shoulder straps on them, enabling the shield to be swung on to the back
enabling the sword to be gripped with two hands, “When he had said this, he
gripped his hilt with both hands, and, fearless of peril, swung his shield upon
his back and slew many.” (Clements, 1999)
The idea that the shields of this
period were weak in some fashion, even though there is evidence of them being
destroyed in the same saga, should not be over-stated, the shield was still
used as the prime defence, “but, distrusting his sword, parried the blows of
both with his shield,” (Clements, 1999). This clearly tells us that the shields
were well-made and there are quite a few mentions of shield bosses made of
metal.
Further to this idea Palmer
(1999) mentions a shield which was evidently passed along, “with the round
target that once had belonged to Thorveig.” (Palmer, 1999:4). This means that
the shield had been through one user and then proceeded to be used by another;
again this disputes the weak nature of shields of this period. There is also
evidence from the same source that they were bordered with iron, “his sword
stuck fast in the iron border of Steinar’s shield.” (Palmer, 1999:4), a factor
which would have extended the life of the shield quite a lot and made it not a
disposable item.
Shield struck and damaged
While it is
true there is evidence from both Clements and Palmer of shields being destroyed
by blows and also cut through, it would seem that the blows which did this were
extraordinary rather than the regular blows the shield would take. Further a
shield which a sword would bite into could be used to the user’s advantage,
“the blow fell on his shield. Gunnar gave the shield a twist as the sword
pierced it, and broke it short off at the hilt.” (Palmer, 1999:17). Thus in
this case while the shield was penetrated the occurrence was used to its
owner’s advantage by breaking the opponent’s sword while it was stuck. Swords
sticking into a shield are evident in more than one place in these sagas.
Use of shield
There is also
evidence of swords not sticking into the edge of a shield, “Kari caught the
blow sideways on his shield, and the sword would not bite;” (Palmer, 1999:22),
clearly the angle at which Kari parried his opponent’s blade was not correct to
catch the opponent’s weapon in the edge of it. The use of the shield to defend
a warrior is evident in many places throughout the sagas, “where he defended
himself, holding his shield before him, and hewing with his sword. They made
little way against him.” (Palmer, 1999:15). In some cases it was holding
ground, and in other cases it was merely defending, “He held his shield before
him and retreated” (Palmer, 1999:15). In either case, the shield was the key to
the warrior’s defence.
Of course
there is also evidence of what would happen if the warrior could not use his
shield in time to block a blow of an opponent, “so he could not throw his
shield before the blow,” and so was struck (Palmer, 1999:19). In this case
“throwing” the shield before the blow is extending it toward the opponent. This
gives evidence that the shield of the Norse warrior was not used in a passive
way, but in an active one.
The shield
was not held back, but extended toward the opponent, “Thorbjorn took his
shield, and held it before him, drew his sword” (Palmer, 1999:15). This would
enable the warrior to have room to move, or draw their sword and presents the
shield in a more active position rather than a more passive one. In most
instances where the shield is used it is in an active position rather than a
more passive situation, “Then Thorbjorn rushed upon Grettir and struck at him,
but he parried it with the buckler [shield] in his left hand and struck with
his sword” (Palmer, 1999:16). This idea of the active use of the shield
culminates in the shield strike where it is used against the opponent, “Thoralf
thrust his shield so hard against Eyvind that he tottered with the shock.”
(Palmer, 1999:24). This shield strike could be made against the shield or directly
against the opponent, either way it demonstrates a very active method of using
the shield rather than a passive one as often has been assumed.
Bibliography
Clements, J. (1999) “Selected Anecdotes and Accounts of Epic
Combat from Saxo Grammaticus”, http://www.thearma.org/essays/Saxo.htm#.WW2B44SGPIU
Palmer, T. (1999) “Viking Fighting Notes from 23 Sagas”, http://www.thearma.org/essays/vikingfight.htm#.WW2BgISGPIU
